06/03/2015
David Cocks Q C Masterminds Distracting His Elite Friends With His Power and Influence So They Endorse His Narrative About His Son Not Having the rights of being part of his family and it being right that he was correct to try to deny him the right to be born despite the European Court saying everyone has the right to life and to family and will not let him speak to him depite the European Court of Human Rights stating the Right to freedom of Speech and Free Expression
David Cocks Q C Masterminds Distracting His Elite Friends With His Power and Influence So They Endorse His Narrative About His Son Not Having the rights of being part of his family and it being right that he was correct to try to deny him the right to be born despite the European Court saying everyone has the right to life and to family and will not let him speak to him despite the European Court of Human Rights stating the Right to freedom of Speech and Free Expression.Anything said to imply that David Cocks Q C should see or support his son he calls SCURRILOUS scurrilous because that way he can get out of anything and not have to look into his conduct and just use smoke himself a man a father with a halo
and mirrors he can make the other person look bad
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
very sad
ReplyDeleteI saw this
ReplyDeleteSurely David Cocks Q C understands the immorality of his actions surely Sarah Child could explain that the way to treat humanly a child is by the example she makes him treat her two children his older step children she is a good mother to Flora and would never allow her son and daughter to be excluded and down graded and must shudder at how David Cocks treats his own child compared with his order step children but has not the courage to demand equality,and why should she she was compensated by being given the farm which he had claimed on tax relief and presumable her genetic children will inherit while his son will be excluded .What courage and kindness will be to his son in that.To destroy his sons inheritance by what he David Cocks considers the weapon of superior force of ruthless cruelty and exclusion and oposional force and suppression rather than upright morality.God allows evil to come because mankind espoused it and lets men and fathers begin to feel the burden of their own cruelty and imperfections when they betray ideals of person and democratic and religious freedom while other are too cowardly to do anything to enlighten ,ideals cannot be betrayed with impunity if a person losses all sense of decency and responsibility.Sarah Child is decent and responsible to her two children and makes David Cocks act accordingly to these adult children she rightly loves but how can she by example make him act this way to his own blood child why does he love and support his step middle aged children all their life even when they were in the marriage of his best friend Robert Wood and Sarah Child before he left Patricia to marry Sarah but never loved his own younger son .No one thinks David Cocks should not love his best friends wife if that is the happiness of his life but why use it as an instrument of cruelty to damage the son of his innocent child,why insist on his exclusion from life (he demanded his pupil abort the child to prove her love for him and told her he would wreck her life and career and never speak to her again if she did not)he told Sir Derek when the baby was on i life support machine as Sir Derek Spencer Solicitor General told the High Court he said "I couldn't care less if he dies he is nothing to me I will never see him and no one can make me"as he drank champagne and went off to his estate to hunt and kill foxes on his expensive horse
utterly cruel and appalling but seemingly typical
ReplyDeleteso tragic
ReplyDeletewhy why why
ReplyDeleteI saw this " From Private Eye.
ReplyDelete"Hallo !
Brilliant Barrister David Cocks Q , hero of the Roger Levitt fraud trial in which he led for the crown, has been in court again-on his own behalf. Sadly for David whose many admirers hope will soon don a judges robes, the decision went the wrong way.
He was in court over the long standing matter of maintenance for his lovechild, born to his former pupil barrister, Felicity. The original order for maintenance was for £25,from which he decided to deduct tax ,leaving the child with £16.24p a week. After more than a decade the mother applied to increase the maintenance, At Marylebone Magistrates court she applied to have the order increased and for it to extend until the end of the boy’s fulltime education.
Mr Cocks opposed this and appealed to the higher court. Joanna Dobson QC ,submitted that “The father has used his advantageous financial position to engage in litigation which is wholly misguided, which may have had as its purpose the intimidation of the mother.” The High Court Judge hearing the appeal decided to award indemnity costs-the highest level possible-against poor old David!
luckily he is not in the same league as those errant fathers who are pursued by the child support agency. David owns a £500,000 house in North London, a £3000 race horse, and still has a few coppers left over to take part in some modest pheasant-shooting and stag and fox hunting.
Things worked out well for the father able to leave both the mothers of his children and run off with his best friends wife
well met by moonlight oh Horatio